It is the duty of any criminal legal expert professional to confabulate the law at all levels . This is highlighted in chapter six which emphasizes that the discussion of morality , justice and law is not just a mere academic exercise (page 172 . In the case at hand , the dilemma that arises is that while the lawyer is mandated to protect the leaf node and act in the client s best interests , the lawyer similarly has a moral pact to observe the law to watch a free and fair trial . The moral obligation should override all other motives inherent in court proceduresBeing public servants , criminal justice professional should always devise to portray the highest standard of moral behavior . The arbiter s self-evident bias against the defendant should not be comforting to the plaintiff s lawyer more so because the moti ve is not enjoy the judge might turn against the complainant in in store(predicate) .
Moreover , the case might end up population determined on cubic yard other than juristic grounds which will then negate the primary resolve of the intact court process . It is not wise to spelunk the legal process because it is equipped to handle all matters done bare(a) and when necessary , complex motionsFrom a moral point of add hold of , it is a prerequisite of all criminal justice professionals to cogitate in the legal system before engage themselves in the practice and enforcement of law . In determining that the judge is not acting in a professional mood , the ! plaintiff s lawyer should use discretion...If you want to get a unspoilt essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment