Community Based Correctional Systems Criminology Essay

Community establish Correctional Systems Criminology EssayCommunity department of corrections is an umbrella phrase, which includes everything from negociate punishments to pre-trial diversion. A union punitive dodge includes any non-incarcerative, but supervised bureau of handling wrongdoers who have already been convicted or who be facing conviction. discussion and probation atomic number 18 the nigh renowned forms of corporation corrections, but the phrase as well includes electronic monitoring, home confinement, course release, day fine programs, restitution, halfway houses, sign in programs, confederacy go, association establish punitive facilities and curfews. In Ohio, fellowship corrections refer to a system of particular facilities, which provide non-residential and residential services to a convicted wrongdoer. A good example of a community establish correctional system in Ohio is the Western Ohio Regional Treatment and replacement Center (W.O.R.T.H. Center). This paper will attempt to cite the strength and weaknesses of the W.O.R.T.H. Center. I will in any case explain whether or not this system serves the community better than institutional correctional systems.DiscussionThe W.O.R.T.H. Center, just like opposite community ground correctional systems in the United States, converges funds from the state, but, it is establish in and operated by the local community in Ohio. In rise to power to this, this center is a male and female community base correctional easiness, which houses bends for a period not exceeding vi months. This center provides an intermediate residential sanction at the front end of the system amongst prison and probation, known as diversion and re-integration services at the stooge end of the system among parole and prison, known as innovation (Bronstein, 2005).The W.O.R.T.H. Center has sundry(a) programs that are aimed at fully rehabilitating the offenders such as moral reconation therapy, skil ls class, chemical dependency, substance abuse, AA meetings, educational services, job readiness, money management, individual retirement account management, domestic violence, public service, parenting classes, Bible study, recreation, and community meetings. Each program is highly structured with evaluation, embracement, follow-up services such as transitional counselor (W.O.R.T.H Center, 2011). The offenders who effectively complete the program at this facility normally breed on non-residential probation that is supervised for a certain period of time. And those offenders who do not are sent to jail.Offenders sentenced to the W.O.R.T.H. Center are normally felony low direct felony offenders or probation offenders who are otherwise headed to jail or prison. Rather than beingnessness sentenced to jail, such offenders are diverted into centers such as the W.O.R.T.H. Center where they receive severe treatment for education, chemical dependency, family relations or employment a ssistance. In numerous ways, the W.O.R.T.H. Center is similar to a conventional prison saddle horse since it is a residential placement with very little freedom to really move around. However, this facility has minimum security operations, which houses between fifty and both hundred male and female offenders, so it is somewhat smaller than almost jails and offers to some extent, to a greater extent freedom to the offender.Community base correctional system such as the W.O.R.T.H. Center is believed to be an evident improvement oer conventional corrections programs for humane reasons. The W.O.R.T.H. Center can be considered humanitarian because it provides less serious male and female offenders with choices, which allow them to continue with various elements of their lives. In addition to this, this community based correctional facility is also humanitarian because it avoids many of the negative effects of incarcerations such as stigmatization, reproach to mental or physical he alth as well as constant scene to sad peers (Bronstein, 2005).Another advantage of the W.O.R.T.H. Center is that it offers opportunities to be more responsive to the needs of victims, offenders and the community at large. For instance, the restorative fortitude program in the W.O.R.T.H. Center is a community alternative to imprisonment. This program targets lawbreakers who are facing a prison term of ab proscribed six months or at times even nine months. Another sentencing externalize is developed for lawbreakers referred to this program that aims to tackle the individual needs of the lawbreaker as well as address victim concerns.Another advantage is that the community programs at this facility are more effective than prison or incarceration. Effectiveness can be calculated in terms of avoiding exposure to undesirable effects, reduce recidivism as well as promoting the successful re-integration of offenders into the community (Bloomberg, 2000). Moreover, the cost of running the W.O.R.T.H. Center is not as costly as conventional prison.However, the W.O.R.T.H. Center is not without its weaknesses. This community based correctional facility appears to have very little impact on the rates of recidivism among the ex-offenders (W.O.R.T.H Center, 2011). In addition to this, since the W.O.R.T.H. Center includes residences or halfway houses where the ex-offenders learn to select the successful transition from prison into society, the residents who live around are naturally unplowed on a strict curfew. In addition to this, these halfway houses are located in a neighborhood, as opposed to remote locations and this usually disturbs the residents of that particular neighborhood, who live in fear of being victimized or even threatened by the ex-offenders residing in the halfway houses.Recidivism is the repetition of criminal behavior. Clearly, one objective of community based correctional system such as the W.O.R.T.H. Center is to prevent the offenders from repeat ing any kind of criminal behavior. In the past, these facilities have been commended for being more effective in reducing recidivism than conventional prison settings since they neer take the offender completely out of the community and that they also provide a transition period between the community and the prison (Bronstein, 2005). Ideally, community based correctional systems teach the offender how to be productive and successful members of the community. But, regrettably, some offenders in community based correctional programs do recidivate. The re-arrest, charging and return of criminals to correctional facilities has a public pencil eraser advantage and numerous social as well as monetary costs.Proponents of community based correctional systems argue that community programs are in reality more effective than prison. Effectiveness can be measured in terms of avoiding exposure to undesirable effects, reducing recidivism and so forth. accord to Benzy (2004), incarceration is not more effective than community corrections in preventing re-offending and treatment programs have been shown to be more effective when delivered in a community setting. What is more, community based correctional programs spare the offenders numerous negative effects of incarceration.I believe that community based correctional system serves the community better than institutional correctional systems. Community based correctional programs facilitate many of the factors linked with the successful re-integration of the offender into the community. For criminals being released from prison into a community based correctional facility, the benefits of community corrections are instead obvious. Not only is the criminal provided with the chance to steadily re-integrate into society, he or she is able to enlist educational and employment opportunities. Moreover, family ties are better maintained when a criminal is residing at a community based correctional facility rather than a prison .Presently, community based correctional facilities have not been widely accepted by the frequent public and this opposition manifests itself in numerous ways. For instance, the general public has never fully embraced community corrections programs like fines, probation, full and day parole, intermittent prison sentences and temporary absences. A majority of communities in the United States are unfriendly to the notion of having residential centers such as the does a community based correctional system serves the community better than institutional correctional systems for law offenders located in their midst for fear that adjacent airscrew values will drop and crime will increase, a phenomenon usually referred to as Not In My Back Yard Syndrome or NIMBY (Benzy, 2004). But, most individuals agree that the current institutional correctional system does not work and many are even willing to consider community based correction systems.Institutional correctional systems such as priso ns generally make individuals worse. Presently, zip fastener much has changed other than that there are many more individuals in prison and our prisons are currently larger and in fact, more destructive of the human personality than before with harsher regimes and fewer programs (Bronstein, 2005). Research reveals that there are only three possible changes in the life of an offender during his or her incarceration in an institutional correctional system approachability of a reasonably supportive job, family upon release, as well as the function of aging that ultimately eradicates criminal behavior as an alternative (Bronstein, 2005). It is rather obvious that in the institutional correctional systems, offenders are incarcerated not to treat them, but for other reasons. Increasingly, such systems are places of punishment and have nothing at all to do with rehabilitation unlike the community-based correctional systems. shutdownCommunity based correctional systems offers workable a lternatives to incarceration for offenders at different stages of the criminal justice process. The alternatives that are available to the offenders include alternative measures programs, bond certificate supervision programs, fine options programs, restitution programs, probation, community service order, parole and so on. The community based correctional system serves the community better than institutional correctional systems since the offenders are given a chance to steadily re-integrate into society, pursue educational and employment opportunities and in general, be more productive in the community.