Electronic Literature: New Horizons For The Literary: Essays

HOW DO I answer MY STUDENTS PROFIT FROM THE SIMILARITIES AND passing BETWEEN write AND ELECTRONIC belles-lettres? Students best c atomic number 18 for innovation if they jazz the standards from which the innovative school text deviates. Daemmrich hoped that her students analyses would reveal to them how digital lit reshapes handed-down writing and designateing, steer their exploration with prompts regarding the divers(prenominal) immersion amid score and digital literature, whether or not digital literature inspired a more wide awake or prosecute reader, how the narrators or speakers persona office differ, the contrariety in the midst of shanghai and digital put on spaces, which medium potty student as more imaginative, and, finally, which they favourite(a) to read . slice reading gustatory modality is more a matter of reek than analytical potential, Daemmrichs students did press a quick respect for the innovations of digital literatureeven those who insis ted that they preferred old fashioned fabrications. \nIn electronic Literature, Katherine Hayles provides teachers with a story, definitions, heathen contexts, and distinctive features of electronic literature. Teachers might format this information into a scaffold that could prevail an enlightening interrogatory into the nature and consequences of battles mingled with digital and print literature. One consequence, for example, is a modified aesthetical. An good enough example to reveal aesthetic assumptions might vex students listing whatsoever criteria for evaluating literary achievement. Teachers might help students to tally where these criteriathe expectations they have for good literaturederive from the cultural history of print productions, advance students to imagine how a digital husbandry will interpolate and create a new aesthetic. \n tool Olsens 10:01 is a perfect conjunction of print and electronic text that should deliver students a sullen envision of the difference between the devil media. The croak is accessible as a print novel in a fairly traditional format, and it is also available as an electronic text, in collaborationism with Tim Gutherie, in the electronic Literature Collection, plenty One. In the digital version, mousing over the characters in the theatre gives the reader/player a more temporally interwoven experience of the characters than turning scallywags that are already line up in order. Indeed, the surprises are more strike when happened upon by the scrutinizing cursor alternatively than followed through page by one-dimensional page. Of course, one could read randomly in the novel, but the truly fact of enumerated pages suggests a linear design, a design whole absent from the electronic iteration. A affinity and contrast by students between these two texts would be positive(predicate) to yield dissever of insights about the differences between print and electronic literature. In electronic L iterature, Katherine Hayles mentions two former(a) print/digital pairings that might work well in the literature classroom: Stephanie Stricklands print poesy: that began as a digital text and then appeared in print.